War is a cool spot to peek on as people got their shirts smoking all along.But on the other side of the fairy tale,tables are stuffed in a room to figure out who got the hands on the victory prize.Sometimes it's sparkling clear but even that tick people start making stories and change the event list upside down.You can say you don't agree so,you can put the eyes on one chapter of the book of pakistan-india shoot out of 1965 where little kids are told by their parents that pakistan won the war but,UN said India had got stuffed in the land they were fighting for.About that the Americans were stabbed down the vietnam towns but some movies picture out that Americans had the vietnam ones blown up by their barrels as those soldiers making out in the film 'we were soldiers'.
Thereby one has to get on with the results listing down the sheet so,here are the wars with consequences that should have been scribbled along the shelves.
PAKISTAN vs INDIA:(1948)
Rumble started to gather up because British cashed the land to the wrong hands.Before partition muslims and hindus stood by crying for land they had to step on.The distribution done got a happy smile on their face but there were pathetic judgements too.Like in Junagadh,that's a town,population was stuffed in with that of muslims and they were ruled on by a hindu so,muslims said it belonged to their zone but it got hidden in the Indian boundry lines.It was because the ruler said so.Second part was that of Kashmir in which again the population was muslim and the leading man was a hindu.He treated his people like thrash so muslims in Pakistan wanted to get him a lesson on his head.Quad,the muslim leader gave him an ultimatum,he said the ruler had to turn down peacefully to his people or he can get on with the hard way that is Pakistani military will clash down on his ground.So he got on the India's back to help him against the raid who dealt with him that he have to turn to India or they won't give a shot to Kashmir.He said yes and thereby India got on with the soldiers on their lines.
And the third state was Hyderabad in which the citizens stuffed in were hindus and leader was a muslim man.Pakistan wanted to get on that soil because of that.And how unfair was that because India got all three states in claiming all the way that they have a leader in one and population in other two.They had to pick one piece,population or king.And to be neutral Pakistan got his heart demanding all the three states as well.They had also to pick one option.So and so,the war reasons were fair some bit because India had most of the 'princely states' and Pakistan was sobbing for a balanced share in town.But the wrong sort is,instead of Pakistan getting on the border line,India got ready to attack.There was a long storyline which says Pakistan had most of the control and India turned on the UNO click to get on with the ceasefire.Pakistan instead of having an upper hand in the game signed in the treaty to stop their cannon balls going out the way.
Everything ceased and matter was given to the UNO who thrashed out the case to the pending box and its still not decided which state will get the share.Pakistanis were frustrated that they should have not held the trigger so that they can get their states.
Whatever the result is,Pakistan had the upper hand out in the war.It had India begging some bit as it got to UN for help.So some say Pakistan have won it and yes they are right because they Pakistan dominated all along.But as far as the causes are looked all along,Pakistan got the real victory flag floating all round,because defence was what Pakistan was fighting for.The real side of the story is,it looked as if both sides' aim was to grab up the princely states but it wasn't.You see,it was India's aim to crush on the Pakistani base and all it had of Kashmir was an excuse.Or take it that way,India fought real hard to defend Kashmir from falling in the Pakistani hands.On the other side of the story Pakistan had planned to fight only Kashmir alone,specifically the ruler of Kashmir.Kashmir couldn't handle it on his own so it got a security(India) back on the curtain.All Kashmir wanted was to get peacefully out of the story and remain in no man's land.It had what it wanted.Till today it's an independent state.
So in 1948,there were three sides fighting for different goals.1)Pakistan:wanted the ruler of Kashmir to treat his people like a man.2)Kashmir:who wanted to remain an independent state and resist the Pakistani army.3)India:who had to cleansweep the Pakistani land.So in this way,neither won Pakistan nor India.Pakistan couldn't stop the ruler to get away from his post or Pakistan couldn't punish him.India couldn't sweep on the Pakistanis.However the third party Kashmir got his goal straight on as an independent state.It got on no man's land so,Kashmir won it!!!
Kashmir is not on anyone's zone.You can peek on the Pakistani or Indian map and in there Kashmir is lined as disputed territory.Which means it's an independent land.And an independent land with people in it can be called an independent state.Its just my view,of course not confirmed by the UN.So Kashmir after all is an independent state bullied on by some raiders and its a battle ground for Indo-Pakistan war,just like vietnam getting in USA and Russian's way.Its just a common way between the two.Just like Pakistan is a common way between Afghanistan and Iran.
Backing up the point,i was just trying to say that Kashmir had been a sort of a country which had won the war.We ignore the fact that Kashmir was a country at that time.So as a country with a goal in a war,with its goal kicked on right,it had won the real war.
Another point listing Kashmir a trophy holder is that the war started between the ruler of Kashmir,Kashmir you can say that and with the Pakistani forces rolling in.India was just an ally in the game and the ruler of Kashmir got his seat remaining under him so,he got the real victory flag other than the two big powers in the zone.